The Daily Reckoning’s

Non-event sparks mass hysteria

August 27th, 2007

Mass hysteria gripped South Florida on Friday.  It came and went in a few hours, but it goes a long way to explain several decades of hysterical policy in Washington, D.C.

It’s natural I’d be thinking about mob psychology of late, as I read Mobs, Messiahs, and Markets – the new book from DR founder Bill Bonner and political journalist Lila Rajiva.  It’s a lively, breezy romp through episodes of collective madness past and present.  You can pre-order here for a special discount.

This particular episode speaks volumes about what happens when large numbers of people fervently, desperately want to believe something in face of little or no supporting evidence.  The large numbers of people are the Cuban exile community, and what they want to believe is that Fidel Castro is dead. 

Rumors have run hot and cold ever since his birthday passed on August 13 with no speech, no letter, no pictures, not even a possibly-years-old audio recording in the style of bin Laden.  The Associated Press captured the atmosphere in a few sentences:

Friday, the rumors were pushed into overdrive by a meeting of local officials to go over their plans for when Castro really dies and a road closure in the Florida Keys that was actually due to a police standoff.

A circular game ensued with radio stations reporting the rumors, citing TV stations, which cited the rumors on the street.

Sandra Avila, an executive at a design firm in Miami's Coconut Grove neighborhood, said clients and vendors called all day asking about the rumors.

"I've heard the rumors before, but there's a different feeling this time, like this time it's real," she said.

Nope.  Nothing doing.  Miami’s ABC affiliate WPLG felt itself obligated to explain why it was reporting hearsay:   

Rumors circulating from Miami to North Carolina and calls coming in to Local 10 said an announcement would be coming from Cuba by the end of Friday that Fidel Castro is dead.

While Local 10 doesn't usually report on rumors, the magnitude of how far reaching this was couldn't be ignored.

What may start as a whisper, quickly grows into a chorus of thousands.

The rumors have circulated for years. Usually every couple of months they'd start, but in the past week, the rumors have been in overdrive.

And what kicked them into overdrive on Friday was especially ludicrous.  The AP again:

Even celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, a Cuban-American who normally deals with Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton, jumped into the fray Friday, writing that sources were saying the Miami police were poised to announce Castro's death.

Never mind the question of why the Miami police department and not the Havana government or, at least, the U.S. State Department would let the world know.

Let’s back up for a moment and contemplate this:  A celebrity rumormonger, spouting what’s nonsense on the face of it, constitutes a key link in a chain reaction that has tens of thousands of people convinced of something for which there’s zero evidence.

But this is an instance in which emotion trumps evidence: 

"For us it's not so much the waiting for the death of a person," said Joanna Burgos, spokeswoman for the Miami-based Raices of Esperanza, a nonpartisan youth group that advocates for a free and democratic Cuba.

"It's much more the waiting for the opportunity for young people on the island to have a chance to live freely, and hopefully that might give them an open door to do so."

Let’s back up further and contemplate the underlying assumption here – that Castro’s death will spontaneously trigger some kind of counterrevolution undoing 48 years of destruction.  Yet as the Miami Herald notes:

Even though it seems clear there won't be any real change on the island immediately after Castro's death, the exile community is preparing for something big nonetheless…

'Every time I buy a plane ticket to go somewhere with my family, I always say, `If Fidel doesn't die,' '' says Maria Elvira Salazar, host of WSBS-SBS 22's talk show Polos Opuestos (Opposite Poles).“In a way, this is going to be like Hurricane Andrew times 10. We don't know what's going to happen, besides the idea that there will be a Pharaonic funeral. But we know when he dies, everything will revolve around his death. [Mega TV will] be on 24-7 for God knows how many days.''

It is only when you start to grasp this depth of emotion that you can grasp why the United States continues to maintain economic sanctions against Cuba, sanctions so severe that those very same exiles’ travel to the island is limited to once every three years – in effect, forcing them to choose between attending their mother’s funeral, or their father’s.

The sanctions remain in place despite decades of evidence that their only accomplishment has been to give Castro and company a convenient scapegoat for Cuba’s wretched economy.  But in the midst of the exiles’ seething hatred for Castro, evidence be damned – even the compelling evidence that the Iron Curtain’s demise was greatly hastened by increased trade and travel between the Warsaw Pact and the West in the 1980s. 

And if the evidence is meaningless to leaders of the exile community, it is equally meaningless to world-improving American politicians, who for decades have kowtowed to exile demands to keep the sanctions in place, convinced they'll bring Castro to his knees any day now.  (A handful of this year’s presidential candidates are open to change, but not Hillary Clinton, who’s every bit as adept as her husband at figuring which way the political winds blow.)

And so a nonsensical policy remains in place, a policy that only strengthens the hand of Castro, exacerbates the misery of ordinary Cubans, and ultimately forestalls the day the Cuban exiles wish for most – when the land of their birth is finally free.

Sphere: Related Content

6 Comments »

  1. Frank J. Gonzalez wrote,

    I am a true-blue philosophical libertarian who has learned a lot about economics through your organization’s writings for the last 7 years or so. I even follow Steve Sarnoff’s options recommendations and I LOVE them.

    I am truly grateful to see truly free-market libertarian economists laying down the truth about the shameful embargo on Cuba that proves the sheer hypocrisy of the Republican Party and the Cuban exiles themselves of which, a bit embarrassingly, I am a first-generation American child.

    I recently read their precious Constitution of 1940. I have heard so much about it that I decided to read it a few days ago. I concluded that it reads like a socialist manifesto.

    It’s no wonder the Cuban exile community’s collective brain is so scrambled. They vote Republican as revenge against Kennedy’s would-have-been unconstitutional invasion of Cuba, but not in any way because they understand and defend “classically” liberal ideals.

    Help us in 2008. Dean Santoro will run as a Ron Paul Republican in the primary, and I will run in the SAME district as a Ron Paul Independent in case Dean does not succeed. If he does, I will withdraw, endorse him and give him the victory by default.

    Yes, we have plans in the event a Democrat even THINKS about jumping in the race. There’s just too much to tell in this comments section!

    Look for us on YouTube!

    Frank J. Gonzalez
    2006 Ron Paul Democrat who received 41% of the vote with just $16,000 against a 14-year incumbent’s $1 million, and many, many other staggering disadvantages.

    Comment on August 27, 2007 @ 4:10 pm

  2. Leopoldo Aguilera Jr. wrote,

    Regarding the embargo, I need to point out that the reason that it has not brought about the potically publicized results, is that it was more political grandstanding than really intende to bring freedom to Cuba. As soft as it is, none of its punitive clauses have ever been enforced by eithe Democrats or Republicans. There is on area which does work and does hurt Castro and that is, the clause that does not allow Castro to borrow money from american institutions nor their foreign afiliates. This my fellow americans hurts Castro and saves you and I a whole bunch of money, for Fidel does not pay his debts. If you have doubts, just ask the European states,ask Russia, Mexico, Argentina, Japan etc.. Now that you know this, is anybody willing to get rid of the embargo and put up their dollars to help that tyranical regime???

    Comment on August 27, 2007 @ 6:58 pm

  3. Dave Gonigam wrote,

    Ah, you flatter me. For the record, I’m not an economist myself, just a recovering establishment journalist who wears a number of hats around here, including the care and feeding of this blog. Good luck with your respective campaigns against whichever Diaz-Balart you’re running against down there; even this political junkie can’t keep them all straight!

    Comment on August 27, 2007 @ 7:35 pm

  4. William Payne wrote,

    What will be interesting to witness when Fidel does lie down for the last time, will be the inevitable conflict between the Cuban exiles that return to their homeland to reclaim homes and property taken in the Castro revolution, and their confrontation with the current owners and inhabitants.

    Look for a Cuban civil war!

    Comment on August 28, 2007 @ 4:28 pm

  5. youknowit wrote,

    It will never happen (the civil war I mean).

    Real fighters would have stayed to fight Castro and what he represented, and not necessarily with violence.

    They have proven when it came to stand and fight, they chose to run.

    Having grown up in the USA, they might be used to the concept of legal action. But in Cuba, who will the people, both regular citizens and the establishment (who controls the legal system) stand with?

    Care to guess?

    Comment on August 29, 2007 @ 10:06 am

  6. Fed Bends the Rules, Behind Gross’ Plea, LTCM Returns, What’s a Jatropha? and More! | 5 Min. Forecast wrote,

    [...] trigger some kind of counterrevolution, undoing 48 years of destruction? Probably not…comment here [...]

    Pingback on May 4, 2009 @ 8:37 pm

Leave a comment

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Powered by WordPress